nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Some pluralist systems, for example Scots law in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, don't specifically suit into the dual common-civil law system classifications. These types of systems might have been heavily influenced because of the Anglo-American common regulation tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted inside the civil law tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not apply, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he has been acquitted from the criminal charges based on evidence and it's properly-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught through the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in assist from the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be attained, the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there could exist conflicts between the various lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
10. Without touching the merits of your case from the issue of yearly increases from the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these once-a-year increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to be made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
The legislation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are the opinions that are filed over the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
Problems or Errors When you encounter any british case law technical problems with this website (for instance a undesirable link or possibly a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Centre.
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of legislation.
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, except for most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. It also regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.